Report-no: hammers040113030373
\
The shareholder value and the customer lifetime value approach are
conceptually and methodically analogous. Both concepts calculate the
value of a particular decision unit by discounting the forecasted net
cash flows by the risk-adjusted cost of capital. However, virtually no
scholarly attention has been devoted to the question if anyof the
components of the shareholder value could be determined in a more
marketoriented way using individual customer lifetime values. Therefore,
the main objective of this paper is to systematically explore the
contribution of both concepts to the field of corporate valuation. At
first we present a comprehensive calculation method for estimating both
the individual lifetime value of a customer and the customer equity.
After a critical examination of the shareholder value concept, a
synthesis of both value approaches allowing for a disaggregated and more
realistic corporate valuation will be presented.
\
Acrobat pdf files:(viewing .pdf)
archive:
9912076.pdf 
is 351389 bytes, 0-13-104,
or 9912076.pdf.gz 
Access statistics for this paper at LogEc
which is a part of the RePEc project as was/is EconWPA.
Translate to another language with babel.altavista.com
EconWPA reference ewp-test/9912076
RePEc reference RePEc:wpa::9912076
send e-mail to
EconWPA began as a conversation between Bob Parks and Larry Blume on January 28, 1993. I located Paul Ginsparg's archive
(then xxx.lanl.gov) and he graciously installed his software on a Sun Sparc system which was supporting the department of economics
email and computation. EconWPA began accepting papers
July 1, 1993 and had ftp, email, gopher and web interfaces. The web interface for submissions was engineered into
existence in July 1995. A complete and catastrophic machine failure in 1999 caused the loss of EconWPA's email
new paper announcment service at
which time there were over 15,000 subscriptions with over 8,000 unique email addresses.
In 2005, Arts and Sciences commandeered the computing services that I had provided to the Department of Economics
since 1987. Some might say that the department was sold out, others would (erroneously) claim that centralization
is efficient, and still others would claim that I have few marketing skills.
I was told that I could keep operating EconWPA (as well as many other services including
rfe.wustl.edu, barnett.wustl.edu, and three RePEc servers) but I would receive no support (hardware, software, or anthing else)
and (as had been the case) no compensation.
At that point, given
the apparent low valuation of my activities by the department, and university,
it made no sense for me to continue operating EconWPA or other services.
Thanks to all who have supported EconWPA in the past.
A Chinese curse states May you live in intersting times. I have. Bob Parks - Jan 2006